As most of you know by now, I have a great deal of respect for the kind of analysis done by  The Daily Bell. But for once, I must take issue with it:

Greeks Run to the IMF: Why the Germans Are Not in Charge of the EU

My argument has been along the following lines: yes, the Anglo-American elite, or what The Daily Bell calls the Anglosphere, is nearing the end of its goal of world government, currency, and so on, but that, as it does so, cracks and fissures will inevitably appear along the fault lines of its internal factional and geopolitical interests. I have argued in a number of books and interviews, for example, that the postwar period saw the establishment of a number of covert and underground fronts representing these various factions and interests, and to reduce analysis simply to one all encompassing scenario of an all-powerful conspiracy is simply to simplify matters. The picture is much to complex, to be reduced or written off to the magic of labels, as I believe this article tends to do.

For one thing, one need only look at someone like Zbnw Brzznsk, or whatever the hell his voweless unpronouncable name is. Here one is dealing with a Rockefailure insider, deeply plugged into all mechanisms and institutions of power: banking, the military industrial complex, academia, the Trilateral Commission and so on. Yet, his own works, and in particular The Grand Chessboard, readily acknowledge the realities of global geopolitics, and competing interests of nations such as Russia, China, and the USA in the Eurasian heartland. To be sure, Brzznsk does advocate moving from a "unipolar" US-centered geopolitical order to a truly global one, but he does not short circuit the geopolitical realities in the process.

The long and short of it is, human nature - and particularly the kinds of sociopaths and criminals accurately portrayed in The Daily Bell article - will inevitably surface, for it is the nature of criminal enterprises not only to enter into alliances with each other, as the article correctly avers, but also into wars with each other, especially as "the prize" draws nearer. The idea that global governance will bring about an era of peace is simply utopian - one might justifiably even say Illuminist - in the extreme, for it is rather a formula for perpetual "civil war" as one faction or another tries to dominate the rest. Among these, we may include religion, intelligence agencies, black projects bureaucracies, Fascist organizations, criminal cartels (both drug runners, arms traders, and banksters), and so on.

The long and short of it is, if there be such a kind of all-powerful conspiracy as is implied in the article, then it is not a smoothly running one by any stretch of the imagination. The Mafia can, does, and did order "hits" on opposing factional leaders notwithstanding its "grand council," and, if you've been following the news lately with strange and mysterious deaths of banksters, so does the elite. As the goal nears, in other words, the cracks and fissures only increase.

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. SSNaga on February 2, 2012 at 6:30 am

    Lol. “Sufficient Unto the Day,” eh? There is NO “ground.” Wake of, “Concrete ‘man.'” Second, EVERYTHING Is SHAPED & CONSTRUCTED from INTENT & the ETHER (Postulated “Foamy” Substance), Utilizing Inherent INTELLIGENCE (In Increasing Proportionate Intellect). … Here’s The Counter-Spiraling Formula: “Desire-INTENT-Will.” Intent, forbAny Supremely UnInformed, Is The Precipitator…: There ‘Isn’t ANY “Intentionless”‘ Order of “Reality.’ Said ‘reality’ is AT ALL TIMES A PRODUCT of “Something” That Emanates Even The Ether, From Which All (“Everything”) Aquires It’s FORM. … I Suggest a little Brushup on QFT, with extra-emphasis on the SuperImplicate. “All that one reads is not necessarily the Truth” (Duh). … Don’t Miss the Last 10 minutes of the following “kiddies-primer” on “THE GROUND or “STUFF” – Whoo-wHoo Makes The Grid(-Frameworks?) – “THE FABRIC OF THE COSMOS” – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy9gXKwRpXc … These Are the “real” Questions, not Your Polarity (Precipitated) Driveway you (& the Elites) “walk” On. … “sir.” (Error is ‘the Order”
    ‘ of Current ever-changing hypotheses re ‘reality’ & it’s sub/super Structure.). Queries Need to be More than Calling the Action ‘Play-By-PAY.’

    • paul degagne on February 3, 2012 at 6:14 am

      Solipsism passed off as physics —

      You remind me of those scientists who sit at the RIGHT HAND OF GOD!


      Someone puts a BLOW-TORCH called Reality under their globius maximus(es)!

      What a laugh!

      • paul degagne on February 3, 2012 at 6:42 am

        I’ll soften my previous response.

        I’ll yield, slightly bend.

        The ground is a bit SHIFTY?

        In these post-modern times
        the ground feels like rocks
        one jumps on
        to cross
        a stream
        the other side

        Where did the other side go?


        NOW TO RETRACT WHAT I JUST POSTED —-This isn’t physics?

        • paul degagne on February 4, 2012 at 5:18 am

          Rocks in a stream as a metaphor for ‘REALITY’ that suggests a ground or a Foundation or an orientation marker for travel in a foreign land (space).

          Evidently people here had other(wise) ideas about the “concept” of reality?

          The rock is just a means to get to the OTHER SIDE. (going along with you people I guess I can transform the rock into a surf board.”)

          Reading this book ( Does Ethics Have a Chance in a World Full of Consumers ) which has an image of a half shell oyster with a lovely pearl on the front cover – I wondered to myself!

          Isn’t that nice — picturing Ethics as a pearl?

          Well this paragraph jumped out at me regarding ‘other sides?”

          Here it is Folks:

          “To Marx, as Theodor Adorno suggested, the world seemed
          ready to turn into a paradise then and there. The world ap-
          peared to be prepared for an instantaneous U – turn, as “the
          possibility of changing the world ‘from top to bottom’ was im-
          mediately present.” However, noted Adorno, this is no longer
          the case — if it ever was (“only stubbornness can still main-
          tain the thesis as Marx formulated it”) (8) The possibility of find-
          ing a shortcut to a world better fit for human habitation has
          been lost. Instead, one would say that between this world,
          here and now, and that other world, hospitable to humanity
          and “user friendly,” there are no visible bridges left, whether
          genuine or putative. Neither are there crowds that would be
          eager to stampede across the length of the bridge if such a
          bridge were designed, nor vehicles able to take the willing to
          the other side and deliver them safely. No one is sure how a us-
          able bridge could be designed and where the bridgehead could
          be located along the shore to facilitate smooth and expedient
          crossings. Such possibilities, one would conclude, are not im-
          mediately present.”


          The above could be sung to the tune of Jan and Dean’s song called SURF CITY1

          Now I am going to spoil my good intentions and say the above paragraph is better sung to the song by the Beach Boys called —“WIPEOUT!” (for all you half-empty (glass?) kind of people, ha, ha!)

      • HAL838 on February 3, 2012 at 7:26 am

        Reality is a “BLOW-TORCH” (?)
        What then, is reality?

        According to one side of Quantum Physics,
        “Reality” is not real……………

        They’re comng to take me away
        They’re coming to take me away.”

        Yeah, well, THEY missed THAT bus !

  2. paul degagne on February 2, 2012 at 4:02 am

    We can imagine what the view is from the top (Elite).

    I can imagine I am standing on the moon!

    I can imagine many things especially in this space called “VIRTUAL REALITY.”

    But does that make them true?

    i would like to experience what is feels like to be in an Eagle’s Nest but that will never be.

    Oh well — time to put my Two Feet ON The Ground!

    I’ve come across this terrific sentence which brought back what Farrell said in Babylon’s Bankers. That he takes a Synoptical Panoramic View or Approach to his investigations. ( I take this as a systematic inquiry? )

    How’s this for a “Literati” Sentence:

    “The task of systematic inquiry is not
    to explore the concealed or manifest intentional structures of reality but to
    interpret the intentionless character of reality, insofar as, by constructing
    figures and images out of the isolated elements of reality, it extracts the
    questions which it is the further task of inquiry to formulate in the most
    pregnant fashion possible. (80)

    (80) Die Aktualitat der Philosphie, AGS, 1:335. [this translation is taken from
    Adorno/Benjamin, The Complete Correspondence, 1928 – 1940, p.9. –Trans.]


    I thought about the nature of the articles Farrell posts here. It reminds me of the ‘task’ of formulating the questions?

    Have a good day folks and formulate, Formulate, and FORMULATE.

    (Err! Excuse me Sir? ha, ha!))

  3. Marshallgeese on February 1, 2012 at 5:15 pm

    Boscombe perspective?

    • Robert Barricklow on February 2, 2012 at 11:49 am

      It comes from a perspective that Sherlock Holmes elucidated on one of his adventures: The Boscombe Valley Mystery.

      “Circumstantial evidence is a very tricky thing…it may seem to point at one thing, but if you shift your own viewpoint a little, you may find it pointing in an equally uncompromising manner to something entirely different…There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.”
      -Sherlock Holmes

      • paul degagne on February 4, 2012 at 4:44 am


        (1) To make (oneself or someone else) familiar, as with a particular subject.
        (2) To make (something) generally known or accepted


        — word not found in the Dictionary and Encyclopedia.
        — Can’t find what your looking for? Try “Google site search” or help us improve by submitting your definition.


        Would Sherlock go along with this:

        Defamiliarize the familiar,

        Familiarize the unfamiliar!


        My Quote: “There is nothing more deceptive than a FAMILIAR obvious fact!”

        Now an unfamiliar ‘obvious fact” is what?

        • Robert Barricklow on February 4, 2012 at 2:19 pm

          “You know a conjuror gets no credit once he has explained his trick.”
          -A Study In Scarlet.

  4. Robert Barricklow on February 1, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    There does ‘appear’ to be three or more “players”.
    But what it looks, to me like, …is one core center, …that expands outwards, into three or more spheres of influence.
    What I’am having trouble with, is how some of those three+ spheres aren’t aware of the deadly center operating within.
    Certainly they are aware of the ‘tools’ regarding control, manipulation, deception, illusions, and the like.
    There is then, perhaps, a “Boscombe Perspective” viewpoint missing, a paradigm shift.
    Perhaps a dimension? Literally.

  5. marcos anthony toledo on February 1, 2012 at 10:39 am

    The Educated Barbaraians are at it again or should we name them the Overschooled Idiots. When have they like other empires not rush in without knowing what they getting into and over their heads. Never learning from others mistakes just repeating only worst than thieir predecessors the same end as always idiots going over the cliff again and again. We will pay with our money and lives as always.

  6. SSNaga on February 1, 2012 at 7:55 am

    Read your opening quote in “‘Genes, Giants, Monsters & Men,” by Charles Fort, regarding “superior slaves or overseers, directing us in accordance with instructions received – from Somewhere else…” Profferng such info to others, but overtly ignoring it, doesn’t enable others to grasp the very nature of what is daily being espoused, that of a likely “Adam bomb” in the making. You just spoke of a “non-Utopian” end-result, which is actually correct. (There will be a pseudo-place where “new” overseers/dogz will be trained by their “loving” Masters!) … I realize you are trying to share & alert, but think clearly – to what end result? Sell books/etc. to keep a modest income; give savvy financial advice (“use the ‘mattress’ bank”)? Without your understanding the Actual Open End of this Situation, you’re really just running your following around in the same manner as the Elite’s are with their (initially) very attractive money-as-debt closed system consciousness. It doesn’t “work” beyond just extending one-day-into-the-next. What is the Shift Alignment About? Are there Doorways Involved that few comprehend? Without Acknowledgement, it can’t Manifest in any of the Unknowing (individuals)… the only Option that can possibly occur is as you are observing for the audience. … You can get the Courage to state what you know/suspect; otherwise, you’re doing what everyone else is, just hoping for “help” (treading the waters), or playing it out in “the best style possible.” Such genius has, certainly, better to offer… (we can all read the newsblogs/etc.) “Just Sayin’.”

  7. HAL838 on February 1, 2012 at 6:19 am

    Their goal brought them together.
    Now the goal is splitting them
    apart like an atom bomb.

    Yes, I’ll agree with that in a NUTshell.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events